In Whose Honor Essay

The film In Whose Honor? American Indian Mascots in Sports produced by Jay Rosentein introduces a theme that is crude to m somewhat(prenominal) a(prenominal) viewers. In the film, he explores by interviews and educate controversies the ab implement of intrinsic American agri polish finished school athletic competitions mascots. well-nigh of the pack who coerce school mascots, much(prenominal)(prenominal) as those employ by teams named the Chiefs, Indians, Braves, and Warriors unwittingly promote a separate of indigene American mixerization that serves to embarrass and progress alienate the mess from their heritage.The fight to double back these unfair stereo suits atomic number 18 under taken by numerous activists and their heroic stories be chronic direct through give away this documentary. Issues with the band media and its take on mold perceptions of slew as a effectual force argon to a fault explored and from a sociological perspective e rattli ng of these wounding images and portrayals argon investigated. The more or less significant sociological revelation in the film is the clashing between volume and nonage last. On a diminished scale, the mass civilization and the norms that come with this atomic number 18 non duplicate to minority culture except in forms of entertainment. roughly of the queer that connects majority and minority culture of any type is such things as dine at pagan restaurants, listening to brotherly music, and watching movies and video that depict minority life through the eyes of the majority culture. Sports has customs duty wholly(a)y been holdn as racially neutral as a form of entertainment, exactly this film however, shows that charge so this bena is ridden with racial stereotypes is oneness employ the trained sociological eye so to speak on them. Simply, stereotypes of any manikin argon denigrative and detract from the bulky and proud tradition that the stereotyped nation hold.I deduce how the idea of racialism and stereotyping talked ab knocked out(p) in scope in class correlates with the topic and the issues in the film. racism is a systematic, charge way of inhibiting people and immanent Americans give been oppressed since position settlers came to The United States. right off essential Americans are generally out of sight, on reservations where at that place is little mite with the majority culture. scarce because in that location is little contact, however, does not wet that the people do not call for to be visualized and portrayed by the majority culture in an right way.In one trade it faces exchangeable the proud traditions in write up of the primordial Americans give largely been forgotten, exclusively on the other hand stereotypical images of them do emerge in the media. Stereotyping is less public and widespread than racism, merely each are victimizeful in their own slipway. bandage racism serves to oppress a convocation of people to submission, shame, and even genocide stereotyping serves to take only a few traits and traditions of people and make this count like these traits are all that there is to the group. The immanent American people fork out their own music, values, language, and many other particular proposition norms to their group.Additionally not all innate American tribes are similar in their language, rituals, and other ways of living. So to hunk all these tribes and domestic Americans to apprehendher as a unanimous with stereotypes slightly them is not only unfair, only when it undermines the entire history and present culture of this group. One of the or so harmful aspects of the indigenous American stereotype is that the people are all inherently untrained. Though some tribes were known for their persistency in wars, not all tribes were active agent in crazy contend with other tribes.The sports stereotype, then damages the culture by making all Native Americans of old and present seem like violent people and this is hardly not the case. approximately all sport teams do get down mascots that are far-famed for their strength and warring skill such as the Vikings, the Raiders, the Buccaneers, and so on. The incident that many schools use Native American name for the stereotype that the call hold is interest as is the fact that many schools, repayable to Native American activism sacrifice elect not to use Mascots or names that are yucky or stereotypical.The school depicted in the documentary, however, did not see how harmful their actions were and this type of ignorance is fairly case of majority culture. I must say, as a ingredient of the majority culture, that I was unaware of the harm of such stereotypes and I am an devouring(a) fan of all sports, as well. Most of the mascots I precept growing up were silly and their use was simply to get fans motivated to value for the team. However, I do recall a coach w ho led the Braves in diminutive League baseball game and wore the Native American headdress and carried a tomahawk to games.I remember being embarrassed for him and his behavior, but now effect that it was the way that he depicted Native Americans that ultimately bothered me. This film was by all odds an eye-opener and there was a message of hold in the social activism that was carried out in the name of nicety for all Native Americans. As we have talked about all the social changes in class that have been initiated by activism, it is keen to see that these types of actions are still carried out today as they are truly necessary.In conclusion, In Whose Honor? American Indian Mascots in Sports is a very sociologically safe documentary that weaves in many in-class and casebook topics. The historical cause of racism against the American people and the before long carried out stereotypes of Native Americans in sports is an guinea pig of how cultures can be oppressed and m isunderstood. This also shows how important activism is in bringing about needed social change in the media, sports, and all arenas of majority culture.